Re: Threaded PosgreSQL server

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Cc: Dann Corbit <DCorbit(at)connx(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Threaded PosgreSQL server
Date: 2002-02-05 15:48:13
Message-ID: 24977.1012924093@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> writes:
> If someone wanted to submit appropriate patches for the v7.3 development
> tree, that merge cleanly, I can't see why this wouldn't be a good thing
> ...

I would resist it. I do not think we need the portability and
reliability headaches that would come with it. Furthermore,
an #ifdef'd implementation would be the worst of all possible
worlds, as it would do major damage to readability of the code.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-02-05 15:53:57 Re: v7.2 rolled last night ...
Previous Message Oleg Bartunov 2002-02-05 15:40:41 Please apply patch for 7.2.1