Re: New vacuum option to do only freezing

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Subject: Re: New vacuum option to do only freezing
Date: 2019-05-18 01:18:16
Message-ID: 24961.1558142296@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> Robert, this indeed looks near trivial. What do you think?

> On 2019-05-09 14:14:20 +0900, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
>> + "toast.vacuum_index_clenaup",

Not trivial enough to not have typos, apparently.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2019-05-18 01:27:24 Re: describe working as intended?
Previous Message David Rowley 2019-05-18 01:14:07 Re: Passing CopyMultiInsertInfo structure to CopyMultiInsertInfoNextFreeSlot()