Re: PostmasterHandl_patch of win32

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Hiroshi Saito" <z-saito(at)guitar(dot)ocn(dot)ne(dot)jp>
Cc: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Subject: Re: PostmasterHandl_patch of win32
Date: 2006-07-16 01:06:39
Message-ID: 24955.1153011999@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

"Hiroshi Saito" <z-saito(at)guitar(dot)ocn(dot)ne(dot)jp> writes:
> Probably, this application will be required.

This seems very messy. The correct fix is just to put back the #include
line, no?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Stark 2006-07-16 01:10:46 Re: Online index builds
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2006-07-16 00:58:04 Re: automatic system info tool?

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hiroshi Saito 2006-07-16 01:33:37 Re: PostmasterHandl_patch of win32
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2006-07-16 00:21:03 Re: Have psql display names and OUT/INOUT in \df output