Re: BUG #3242: FATAL: could not unlock semaphore: error code 298

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Marcin Waldowski <M(dot)Waldowski(at)sulechow(dot)net>
Cc: magnus(at)hagander(dot)net, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #3242: FATAL: could not unlock semaphore: error code 298
Date: 2007-04-24 07:38:47
Message-ID: 24944.1177400327@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers

Marcin Waldowski <M(dot)Waldowski(at)sulechow(dot)net> writes:
> I was thinking that this fix will be included in 8.2.4 :) Now I know
> that it's too late (8.2.4 is released). Now I trying to find what
> conditions causes to realease new version of PostgreSQL (with fixes).
> Does any document exist about that?

No, there's no fixed policy about that, because every time it's
different.

We don't normally like to release updates oftener than once every couple
of months --- the overhead of an update, for committers, packagers, and
users, is just too high to do it oftener than we must.

As far as this specific issue goes, I don't feel a need for a prompt
update, because (a) it's platform-specific, and (b) it's extremely
infrequent, as demonstrated by the lack of prior complaints.

But it's not unlikely that a new release might happen PDQ, once
we have figured out all the implications of this problem:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2007-04/msg00129.php
That one's looking pretty dang ugly from here.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Meskes 2007-04-24 07:44:57 Re: [HACKERS] BUG #3244: problem with PREPARE
Previous Message Marcin Waldowski 2007-04-24 07:10:12 Re: BUG #3242: FATAL: could not unlock semaphore: error code 298

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Meskes 2007-04-24 07:44:57 Re: [HACKERS] BUG #3244: problem with PREPARE
Previous Message Hiroki Kataoka 2007-04-24 07:22:39 Re: Dead Space Map version 3 (simplified)