Re: Anyone seen this kind of lock pileup?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: postgres performance list <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Anyone seen this kind of lock pileup?
Date: 2010-11-17 21:58:52
Message-ID: 24934.1290031132@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
> Having an interesting issue on one 8.4 database. Due to poor
> application design, the application is requesting 8-15 exclusive
> (update) locks on the same row on parallel connections pretty much
> simultaneously (i.e. < 50ms apart).

> What's odd about this is that the resulting "lock pileup" takes a
> mysterious 2-3.5 seconds to clear, despite the fact that none of the
> connections are *doing* anything during that time, nor are there
> deadlock errors. In theory at least, the locks should clear out in
> reverse order in less than a second; none of the individual statements
> takes more than 10ms to execute.

Hmm ... can you extract a test case? Or at least strace the backends
involved?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mladen Gogala 2010-11-17 22:00:03 Re: Query Performance SQL Server vs. Postgresql
Previous Message Rich 2010-11-17 21:51:55 Re: Query Performance SQL Server vs. Postgresql