Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> ... indeed. Is it worth burdening the pg_stats mechanism with this?
>> The use case seems vanishingly thin.
> I am confused how this is different from inet_server_addr() and
> inet_server_port().
I think the point is to let someone find out *from another session*
which server port number a particular session is using. I fail to see
a significant use case for that, though.
regards, tom lane