Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: andrew(at)supernews(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1
Date: 2005-05-02 20:16:41
Message-ID: 2492.1115065001@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew - Supernews <andrew+nonews(at)supernews(dot)com> writes:
> Then the client has to guarantee that it can stop whatever it was doing
> (which might have nothing to do with the database) every so often in
> order to send a message; this isn't feasible for most clients.

It's certainly infeasible for libpq, which has no portable way to force
the calling app to give it control.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim C. Nasby 2005-05-02 20:20:30 Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-05-02 20:15:32 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement