From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
Cc: | "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: 7.4 features list |
Date: | 2003-05-06 14:06:12 |
Message-ID: | 24900.1052229972@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> writes:
> I think we should delay. Win32, whilst not important for many of the
> people on this list is extremely important for the project itself in my
> opinion. It is the one major 'feature' that even complete newbies pass
> us by because we lack it, and head straight for MySQL.
The fact that people are putting so much emphasis on attracting newbies
via the Windows port seems to me to be a good reason *not* to delay 7.4
for it. If we slip the schedule for it, what we will have is a rushed,
probably not very solid port. How many newbies will we lose permanently
if their first exposure to Postgres is a buggy Windows port?
I'd far rather see it done right for 7.5 than done hurriedly for 7.4.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Page | 2003-05-06 14:14:57 | Re: 7.4 features list |
Previous Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2003-05-06 14:04:39 | Re: [PERFORM] Hypothetical suggestions for planner, indexing |