Re: knngist patch preliminary review (2010-09 commitfest)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>
Subject: Re: knngist patch preliminary review (2010-09 commitfest)
Date: 2010-09-22 14:30:45
Message-ID: 24889.1285165845@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk> writes:
> My opinion is that the gist-implementation section of the docs needs
> to be substantially expanded so that it explains, for each support
> function, exactly what the function is expected to do.

Yes, the GIST (and GIN) parts of the docs are really pretty bad.

> If it would help, I'm prepared to put some time towards actually
> writing something up for this.

That would be outstanding.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2010-09-22 14:33:39 Re: Git cvsserver serious issue
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2010-09-22 14:26:59 Re: Git cvsserver serious issue