| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev(at)SECTORBASE(dot)COM> |
| Cc: | "'The Hermit Hacker'" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)hub(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: WAL status update |
| Date: | 2000-11-02 09:14:56 |
| Message-ID: | 24843.973156496@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev(at)SECTORBASE(dot)COM> writes:
> I think that at least 1 & 2 from WAL todo (checkpoints and port to
> machines without TAS) is required before beta.
I'm not sure that you do need to add support for machines without TAS.
I pointed out a couple months ago that the non-TAS support code hasn't
even compiled for the past release or three, and proposed ripping it
all out rather than fixing code that clearly isn't being used.
No one objected.
I haven't got round to doing the ripping yet, but as far as I know
there is no reason to expend work on adding more code for the non-TAS
case.
I have a few other things I still need to do before 7.1 beta. Do you
think you'll be ready in, say, a week?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Denis Perchine | 2000-11-02 13:39:29 | DROP hangup... |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2000-11-02 09:10:25 | Re: Contexts |