Re: 4 Clause license?

From: Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org>
To: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Postgresql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 4 Clause license?
Date: 2003-11-20 20:17:34
Message-ID: 248230000.1069359454@lerlaptop-red.iadfw.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

--On Thursday, November 20, 2003 16:00:44 -0400 "Marc G. Fournier"
<scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:

> On Thu, 20 Nov 2003, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
>> Based on the below wouldn't they also have to go after Microsoft?
>
> Depends ... does MicroSoft use BSD TCP/IP, or did they write their own? I
> know that Linux is not using BSD TCP/IP (or, at least, they didn't in
> their first 3 incarnations of the stack) ...
M$ also bought a LARGE license from SCO...

--
Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: ler(at)lerctr(dot)org
US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-11-20 20:19:38 Re: Release cycle length
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2003-11-20 20:07:30 Re: 4 Clause license?