Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Henshall, Stuart - WCP" <SHenshall(at)westcountrypublications(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Fernando Nasser <fnasser(at)redhat(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects
Date: 2002-01-23 14:59:39
Message-ID: 2477.1011797979@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Henshall, Stuart - WCP" <SHenshall(at)westcountrypublications(dot)co(dot)uk> writes:
> Could you just have a general rule of search in order of age (by OID)?

No, unless you plan to abandon the whole notion of resolving ambiguous
operator/function calls. (Which'd cut down our TODO list a good bit ;-)
but I don't think users would be happy...) OID/age ordering generally
has little to do with reasonable resolution behavior.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-01-23 15:06:19 Re: Schemas vs. PostQUEL: resolving qualified identifiers
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-01-23 14:56:45 Re: pltcl build problem on FreeBSD (was: Re: pltlc and pltlcu problems)