Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On 9 November 2012 23:24, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> I'm inclined to think that we need to fix this by getting rid of
>> RestoreBkpBlocks per se, and instead having the per-WAL-record restore
>> routines dictate when each full-page image is restored (and whether or
>> not to release the buffer lock immediately). That's not going to be a
>> small change unfortunately :-(
> No, but it looks like a clear bug scenario and a clear resolution also.
> I'll start looking at it.
I'm on it already.
regards, tom lane