Re: WIP: a way forward on bootstrap data

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: John Naylor <jcnaylor(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: WIP: a way forward on bootstrap data
Date: 2018-04-05 20:47:28
Message-ID: 24760.1522961248@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

John Naylor <jcnaylor(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> It seems most of the time the FooRelationId labels are predictable,
> although not as pristine as the Anum_* constants. One possibility that
> came to mind is to treat these like pg_type OID #defines -- have a
> simple rule that can be overridden for historical reasons.

Meh. I'd just as soon avoid having some catalogs done one way and
some another.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tomas Vondra 2018-04-05 20:49:03 Re: Parallel Aggregates for string_agg and array_agg
Previous Message Tomas Vondra 2018-04-05 20:46:26 Re: Parallel Aggregates for string_agg and array_agg