| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Ali Akbar <the(dot)apaan(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Function array_agg(array) |
| Date: | 2014-10-11 15:28:58 |
| Message-ID: | 24748.1413041338@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Ali Akbar <the(dot)apaan(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> So, can't we just set the typarray of array types to its self oid?
Seems dangerous as heck; certainly it would have side-effects far more
wide-ranging than just making this particular function work.
A safer answer is to split array_agg into two functions,
array_agg(anynonarray) -> anyarray
array_agg(anyarray) -> anyarray
I rather imagine you should do that anyway, because I really doubt
that this hack is operating quite as intended. I suspect you are
producing arrays containing arrays as elements, not true 2-D arrays.
That's not a direction we want to go in I think; certainly there are
no other operations that produce such things.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2014-10-11 16:45:24 | Re: jsonb contains behaviour weirdness |
| Previous Message | Ali Akbar | 2014-10-11 14:57:38 | Function array_agg(array) |