From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Haroon (dot)" <contact(dot)mharoon(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Haroon <muhammad(dot)haroon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Umair Shahid <umair(dot)shahid(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: initdb issue on 64-bit Windows - (Was: [pgsql-packagers] PG 9.6beta2 tarballs are ready) |
Date: | 2016-06-25 13:45:45 |
Message-ID: | 2470.1466862345@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Haroon ." <contact(dot)mharoon(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> And if I comment these out i.e. setup_description, setup_privileges and
> 'setup_schema' it seem to progress well without any errors/crashes.
Presumably, what you've done there is remove every single join query
from the post-bootstrap scripts. That isn't particularly useful in
itself, but it does suggest that you would be able to fire up a
normal session afterwards in which you could use a more conventional
debugging approach. The problem can evidently be categorized as
"planning of any join query whatsoever crashes", so a test case
ought to be easy enough to come by.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2016-06-25 15:15:31 | Re: Memory leak in Pl/Python |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2016-06-25 13:40:58 | Re: initdb issue on 64-bit Windows - (Was: [pgsql-packagers] PG 9.6beta2 tarballs are ready) |