| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net |
| Cc: | "Gregory Stark" <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, "Lukas Smith" <smith(at)pooteeweet(dot)org>, "David Fetter" <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: 8.2 features status |
| Date: | 2006-08-05 03:17:51 |
| Message-ID: | 24693.1154747871@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net writes:
>> I don't object to someone informally polling people who have claimed a
>> TODO item and not produced any visible progress for awhile. But I think
>> anything like "thou shalt report in once a week" will merely drive
>> people away from publicly claiming items, if not drive them away from
>> doing anything at all.
> The former is much more what I had in mind than the latter. Let's do that.
Like I said, no objection here. But who exactly is "we" --- ie, who's
going to do the legwork? We surely don't want multiple people pestering
the same developer ...
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2006-08-05 03:20:35 | Re: 8.2 features status |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-08-05 02:58:51 | Re: 8.2 features status |