Re: [PATCH] Push limit to sort through a subquery

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Douglas Doole <dougdoole(at)gmail(dot)com>, Konstantin Knizhnik <k(dot)knizhnik(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Push limit to sort through a subquery
Date: 2017-08-24 17:24:15
Message-ID: 24672.1503595455@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I wrote:
> To get the buildfarm back to green, I agree with the suggestion of
> setting force_parallel_mode=off for this test, at least for now.

Actually, there's an easier way: we can just make the test table be
TEMP. That is a good idea anyway to prevent possible interference
from auto-analyze, which conceivably could come along at just the
wrong time and cause a plan change.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alexander Kuzmenkov 2017-08-24 17:24:50 Re: type cache for concat functions
Previous Message Douglas Doole 2017-08-24 17:07:37 Re: [PATCH] Push limit to sort through a subquery