| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> |
| Cc: | "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "PostgreSQL Win32 port list" <pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Win32 lost signals open item |
| Date: | 2004-11-01 20:24:56 |
| Message-ID: | 24668.1099340696@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-hackers-win32 |
"Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> writes:
> [ proposed fix ]
> As you can see, this is quite a bit more complicated than the simple
> CreateProcess() call we have now.
> ...
> If this seems like a reasonable approach, I can see if I can get
> something together. But it's a fairly large change..
It sounds reasonable to me, in the sense that it is a localized change,
even if rather messy. (Perhaps this chunk of code should be pushed into
src/port someplace, instead of being dropped into postmaster.c?)
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2004-11-01 20:38:43 | Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Win32 lost signals open item |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-11-01 20:19:52 | Re: UPDATE is not allowed in a non-volatile function |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2004-11-01 20:38:43 | Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Win32 lost signals open item |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2004-11-01 20:04:26 | Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Win32 lost signals open item |