From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> |
Cc: | "Florian Pflug" <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>, "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Thomas Munro" <munro(at)ip9(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: strict aliasing (was: const correctness) |
Date: | 2011-11-14 20:19:01 |
Message-ID: | 24666.1321301941@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> writes:
> The results were interesting. While the small overlap between
> samples from the two builds at most levels means that this was
> somewhat unlikely to be just sampling noise, there could have been
> alignment issues that account for some of the differences. In
> short, the strict aliasing build always beat the other with 4
> clients or fewer (on this 4 core machine), but always lost with more
> than 4 clients.
That is *weird*.
> Also, is there something I should do to deal with the warnings
> before this would be considered a meaningful test?
Dunno ... where were the warnings exactly? Also, did you run the
regression tests (particularly the parallel version) against the
build?
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2011-11-14 20:30:50 | Re: strict aliasing (was: const correctness) |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2011-11-14 20:07:54 | Re: Concurrent CREATE TABLE/DROP SCHEMA leaves inconsistent leftovers |