Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: query cache

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Billy Earney <billy(dot)earney(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: query cache
Date: 2012-03-23 18:54:50
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> What I think is more common is the repeated submission of queries that
> are *nearly* identical, but with either different parameter bindings
> or different constants.  It would be nice to have some kind of cache
> that would allow us to avoid the overhead of parsing and planning
> nearly identical statements over and over again, but the trick is that
> you have to fingerprint the query to notice that's happening in the
> first place, and the fingerprinting has to cost less than what the
> cache saves you.  I don't know whether that's possible, but I suspect
> it's far from easy.

The traditional solution to this is to make the application do it, ie,
parameterized prepared statements.  Since that has direct benefits to
the application as well, in that it can use out-of-line values and
thereby avoid quoting and SQL-injection risks, it's not apparent that
it's a good idea to expend lots of sweat to reverse-engineer
parameterization from a collection of unparameterized queries.

			regards, tom lane

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Merlin MoncureDate: 2012-03-23 19:01:54
Subject: Re: Apology to the community
Previous:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2012-03-23 18:43:25
Subject: Apology to the community

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group