Re: Fixing findDependentObjects()'s dependency on scan order (regressions in DROP diagnostic messages)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Fixing findDependentObjects()'s dependency on scan order (regressions in DROP diagnostic messages)
Date: 2019-02-10 16:50:19
Message-ID: 24613.1549817419@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I wrote:
> Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> writes:
>>> [ invent separate primary and secondary partition dependencies? ]

>> I lean towards changing these on HEAD, ...

> Me too.

Here's a version of the patch that does it that way.

regards, tom lane

Attachment Content-Type Size
fix-partition-dependencies-2.patch text/x-diff 45.4 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chapman Flack 2019-02-10 17:43:26 Re: PostgreSQL vs SQL/XML Standards
Previous Message Justin Pryzby 2019-02-10 16:50:07 Re: dsa_allocate() faliure