Re: Revised Patch to allow multiple table locks in "Unison"

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Neil Padgett <npadgett(at)redhat(dot)com>
Cc: Fernando Nasser <fnasser(at)redhat(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>, "pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Revised Patch to allow multiple table locks in "Unison"
Date: 2001-07-31 19:56:39
Message-ID: 24550.996609399@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Neil Padgett <npadgett(at)redhat(dot)com> writes:
> 4. Go with the original patch but sans OID sort. In this case, LOCK a,b;
> degrades into a short form for LOCK a; LOCk b; This is still useful for
> Oracle compatibility.
> Satisfies the TODO list item.

I like this one. It's not clear to me that this TODO item is worth
even as much effort as we've put into the discussion already ;-),
let alone a major lockmanager overhaul. And I definitely don't want a
version that "usually works" ... simple and reliable is beautiful.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-07-31 20:00:28 Re: [PATCHES] Allow IDENT authentication on local connections (Linux only)
Previous Message Oliver Elphick 2001-07-31 19:45:58 Re: [PATCHES] Allow IDENT authentication on local connections (Linux only)

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-07-31 20:09:51 Re: Fuzzy matching?
Previous Message Neil Padgett 2001-07-31 18:56:51 Re: Revised Patch to allow multiple table locks in "Unison"