Re: Building on S390

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hacker <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, postgres-xc-developers(at)lists(dot)sourceforge(dot)net
Subject: Re: Building on S390
Date: 2013-11-22 20:06:24
Message-ID: 24535.1385150784@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
> On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 11:27:45AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Furthermore, if we change that convention now, we're going to increase
>> the risk of such mixing failures for other people.

> Sure, but if this a bug we should. I'm not saying it is, I simply don't know.

Well, *if* it's a bug in core PG then we should do something about it,
but at the moment there's no evidence of that. What seems the most
likely theory here is that the Debian maintainer has broken their package
with an ill-considered patch. We can't take responsibility for other
people's hacks.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2013-11-22 20:13:33 Re: pg_upgrade ?deficiency
Previous Message Andres Freund 2013-11-22 19:55:21 Re: Replication Node Identifiers and crashsafe Apply Progress