| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Álvaro Hernández Tortosa <aht(at)8kdata(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Some thoughts about SCRAM implementation |
| Date: | 2017-04-12 17:11:46 |
| Message-ID: | 24529.1492017106@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> writes:
> * Tom Lane (tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us) wrote:
>> ... which the user can't tell apart from having fat-fingered the password,
>> I suppose? Doesn't sound terribly friendly. A report of a certificate
>> mismatch is far more likely to lead people to realize there's a MITM.
> We might be able to improve on that.
I'd sure be happier about this being a useful feature if we can. But
unless someone has a design for that ready-to-go, that's another good
reason to put it off.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2017-04-12 17:12:22 | Re: Patch: Write Amplification Reduction Method (WARM) |
| Previous Message | Alexander Kuzmenkov | 2017-04-12 17:10:36 | Re: index-only count(*) for indexes supporting bitmap scans |