Re: pg_class catalog question...

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Thomas Hallgren <thomas(at)tada(dot)se>
Cc: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>, "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>, Qingqing Zhou <zhouqq(at)cs(dot)toronto(dot)edu>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_class catalog question...
Date: 2006-04-02 19:18:50
Message-ID: 24498.1144005530@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Thomas Hallgren <thomas(at)tada(dot)se> writes:
> Jim C. Nasby wrote:
>> Well, hex is much easier to deal with in many regards than raw bytes,
>> though. But yes, the idea is that you'd just store raw bytes on disk.
>> byte or octet would work fine if they existed.
>>
> IIRC, Oracle actually uses the term RAW. It makes sense I think. No
> conversion applied, no nothing. Just simple raw data.

bytea does that.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jonah H. Harris 2006-04-02 19:38:48 Re: pg_class catalog question...
Previous Message Thomas Hallgren 2006-04-02 18:53:46 Re: pg_class catalog question...