| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, Yoshiyuki Asaba <y-asaba(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: SO_SNDBUF size is small on win32? |
| Date: | 2006-06-27 16:28:35 |
| Message-ID: | 24469.1151425715@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 12:23:13AM +0900, Yoshiyuki Asaba wrote:
>>> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/823764/EN-US/
> No, it says it occurs if this condition is met: "A single *send* call or
> *WSASend* call fills the whole underlying socket send buffer."
It also says that the condition only occurs if the program uses
non-blocking sockets ... which the backend does not. So this page
offers no support for the proposed patch.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2006-06-27 16:29:39 | Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC |
| Previous Message | Thomas Hallgren | 2006-06-27 16:26:14 | [Fwd: Re: [Pljava-dev] char with trailing space, PreparedStatement.setObject & SetString] |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Yoshiyuki Asaba | 2006-06-27 16:33:48 | Re: SO_SNDBUF size is small on win32? |
| Previous Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2006-06-27 16:13:18 | Re: SO_SNDBUF size is small on win32? |