Re: [PATCHES] MinGW patch

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Win32 port list <pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] MinGW patch
Date: 2003-09-07 13:58:23
Message-ID: 24380.1062943103@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-cygwin pgsql-hackers-win32 pgsql-patches

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> Why does configure need to see those files? Surely you don't need
> configure to test the capabilities of our own source tree?

Looking at the contents of src/include/port/win32, I would imagine the
problem is configure will decide we don't HAVE_SYS_SOCKET_H, etc.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-cygwin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-09-07 15:30:26 Re: [PATCHES] MinGW patch
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2003-09-07 10:03:52 Re: [PATCHES] MinGW patch

Browse pgsql-hackers-win32 by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-09-07 15:30:26 Re: [PATCHES] MinGW patch
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2003-09-07 10:03:52 Re: [PATCHES] MinGW patch

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-09-07 14:19:07 Re: Minor lmgr code cleanup
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2003-09-07 10:03:52 Re: [PATCHES] MinGW patch