Re: pg_locks view and user locks

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Merlin Moncure" <merlin(dot)moncure(at)rcsonline(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Subject: Re: pg_locks view and user locks
Date: 2004-09-13 21:25:42
Message-ID: 24366.1095110742@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Merlin Moncure" <merlin(dot)moncure(at)rcsonline(dot)com> writes:
> ... is there any merit to promoting the user lock wrappers out of contrib

Dunno. Yours is the first message I can recall in quite a long time
indicating that anyone was using userlocks. I thought the code was kind
of dying on the vine. Of course it's hard to tell whether that's not
just *because* it's in contrib and not mainstream. But personally I'd
like to see some more evidence of use before we promote it. (And yeah,
the API could probably use some cleanup first.)

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-09-13 21:31:15 Re: [HACKERS] pg_locks view and user locks
Previous Message Merlin Moncure 2004-09-13 21:04:03 Re: pg_locks view and user locks