Re: B-Tree support function number 3 (strxfrm() optimization)

Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> writes:
> I think that those are objectively very large reductions in a cost
> that figures prominently in most workloads. Based solely on those
> facts, but also on the fairly low complexity of the patch, it may be
> worth considering committing this before 9.4 goes into feature freeze,

Personally, I have paid no attention to this thread and have no intention
of doing so before feature freeze. There are three dozen patches at
https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/commitfest_view?id=21
that have moral priority for consideration for 9.4. Not all of them are
going to get in, certainly, and I'm already feeling a lot of guilt about
the small amount of time I've been able to devote to reviewing/committing
patches this cycle. Spending time now on patches that didn't even exist
at the submission deadline feels quite unfair to me.

Perhaps I shouldn't lay my own guilt trip on other committers --- but
I think it would be a bad precedent to not deal with the existing patch
queue first.

regards, tom lane