Re: Syntax question

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Syntax question
Date: 2004-05-23 16:02:07
Message-ID: 24279.1085328127@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> 2) ALTER TABLE / DROP CLUSTER ON idx

> I like this form, however to make it work, we need to bump CLUSTER to
> being a reserved keyword.

I do not think this form is enough better than the other to justify
creating a nonstandard fully-reserved word. I'd go with SET WITHOUT.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-05-23 16:06:40 Re: Unicode upper/lower solution proposal
Previous Message Bruno Wolff III 2004-05-23 15:57:46 Re: Latest requests from IRC