| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: troubleshooting pointers |
| Date: | 2002-05-09 23:28:09 |
| Message-ID: | 24276.1020986889@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> writes:
> With the current SRF patch, in certain circumstances selecting from a
> VIEW produces "Buffer Leak" warnings, while selecting from the function
> itself does not. Also the VIEW returns only one of the two expected
> rows.
The buffer leak suggests failure to shut down a plan tree (ie, no
ExecutorEnd call). Probably related to not running the VIEW to
completion, but it's hard to guess at the underlying cause.
Do the plan trees (EXPLAIN display) look the same in both cases?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joe Conway | 2002-05-09 23:42:36 | Re: troubleshooting pointers |
| Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2002-05-09 23:27:32 | Re: www.pgaccess.org - the official story (the way I saw |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joe Conway | 2002-05-09 23:42:36 | Re: troubleshooting pointers |
| Previous Message | Joe Conway | 2002-05-09 20:32:57 | Re: troubleshooting pointers |