Re: Re: AW: Re: OID wraparound: summary and proposal

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: mlw <markw(at)mohawksoft(dot)com>
Cc: Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>, Alex Pilosov <alex(at)pilosoft(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Re: AW: Re: OID wraparound: summary and proposal
Date: 2001-08-06 19:45:53
Message-ID: 24229.997127153@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

mlw <markw(at)mohawksoft(dot)com> writes:
> Am I being overly simplistic?

Yes. For one thing, Relation structs are *not* shared, nor even
persistent (the relcache will happily discard them). For another, you
haven't mentioned how we keep the counter up-to-date across system
restarts.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2001-08-06 19:47:01 Re: Possible solution for LIKE optimization
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2001-08-06 19:40:04 Not representable result out of too large range