Re: PL/pgSQL RENAME functionality in TODOs

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: imad <immaad(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Jim Nasby" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>, "Pavel Stehule" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)hotmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PL/pgSQL RENAME functionality in TODOs
Date: 2007-02-02 21:11:37
Message-ID: 24190.1170450697@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

imad <immaad(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> So, should we still consider it a ToDo?

Whatever you think about the rename-in-same-block-as-declared case,
it's still broken, as per my example showing that the effects are not
limited to the containing block. However, considering that no one
has taken an interest in fixing it since 7.2, it's obviously not a
high-priority feature.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2007-02-02 21:14:33 Re: Referential Integrity and SHARE locks
Previous Message Ioseph Kim 2007-02-02 21:00:29 Re: problem of geometric operator in v8.2.1