Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> Uh, sorry. My proposal a couple of years back was to put the
> relfilenode, not the name. I didn't notice that it was the name being
> proposed here. However, now I notice that this idea doesn't solve the
> problem for mapped relations.
Well, as long as a catalog lookup would be required anyway, what about
putting in the table OID?
regards, tom lane