Re: type unknown - how important is it?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com
Cc: Shachar Shemesh <psql(at)shemesh(dot)biz>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Postgresql OLE DB development <oledb-dev(at)gborg(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: type unknown - how important is it?
Date: 2005-03-17 15:20:03
Message-ID: 24156.1111072803@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com> writes:
> Shachar Shemesh wrote:
>> I don't know type 705 well enough to decide which would work best. If
>> it's guaranteed to be a validly encoded text string, then I'll just
>> put it in as DBTYPE_WSTR, and get it done with.

> I think it's safe to assume it will be encoded properly.

AFAICS it will work exactly like 'text'.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Shachar Shemesh 2005-03-17 15:29:18 Re: type unknown - how important is it?
Previous Message Dave Cramer 2005-03-17 15:15:19 Re: type unknown - how important is it?