Re: Temporary Views

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee>, Rod Taylor <rbt(at)zort(dot)ca>, Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Temporary Views
Date: 2002-08-13 23:23:58
Message-ID: 2414.1029281038@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> My feeling is that either the view is temporary, fully, or it isn't. I
> don't see having it in the public namespace _and_ removing it on session
> exit as defensible.

I disagree ... (and who said this was necessarily the public namespace,
anyway? Perhaps the view is in a private, but not temp namespace.)

But I doubt we'll convince each other. Can we hear some other opinions?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gavin Sherry 2002-08-13 23:31:52 Re: Possible enhancement : replace view ?
Previous Message Emmanuel Charpentier 2002-08-13 23:23:14 Re: Possible enhancement : replace view ?