Re: pgindent && weirdness

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Piotr Stefaniak <postgres(at)piotr-stefaniak(dot)me>
Subject: Re: pgindent && weirdness
Date: 2020-05-16 15:58:41
Message-ID: 24079.1589644721@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 10:15 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> +1. I think the repo will let you in, but if not, I can do it.

> It seems I cannot. Please go ahead.

Pushed, and I bumped pg_bsd_indent's version to 2.1.1, and synced
our core repo with that.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ranier Vilela 2020-05-16 16:28:28 Re: Multiple FPI_FOR_HINT for the same block during killing btree index items
Previous Message Tom Lane 2020-05-16 15:56:28 Re: pg_bsd_indent and -Wimplicit-fallthrough