Re: "lo" large object

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Patrick Welche <prlw1(at)newn(dot)cam(dot)ac(dot)uk>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: "lo" large object
Date: 2002-09-25 20:11:24
Message-ID: 24071.1032984684@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Patrick Welche <prlw1(at)newn(dot)cam(dot)ac(dot)uk> writes:
> lo being the type to keep psqlodbc happy when importing M$ access files. The
> old definition was:

> CREATE TYPE lo (
> INTERNALLENGTH = 4,
> INPUT = int4in,
> OUTPUT = int4out,

Hm. The system doesn't tolerate type cheats like that anymore
(and the code was wrong anyway, since it should've been using
oidin/oidout).

I guess we'll have to fix the contrib/lo module. Thanks for the
report...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paesold 2002-09-25 20:21:24 Re: Getting current transaction id
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-09-25 20:08:28 Re: Fwd: ERRONIOUS .cpg parsing