| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: New version numbering practices |
| Date: | 2016-08-04 19:18:46 |
| Message-ID: | 2406dff0-6e9d-75b1-d638-36e3dfdb76dc@2ndquadrant.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 8/3/16 1:20 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> I was just wondering whether it would be worth starting to use "git tag -a".
One should always use annotated tags for public releases. That way, the
tag is its own Git object that cannot be later moved around or easily
faked (modulo GPG signatures -- a whole different discussion).
Unannotated tags are more intended for private labels.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2016-08-04 20:12:19 | Re: New version numbering practices |
| Previous Message | Claudio Freire | 2016-08-04 18:33:16 | Re: Heap WARM Tuples - Design Draft |