Re: [HACKERS] Re: Complexity of contrib types

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: Complexity of contrib types
Date: 1998-07-21 15:23:17
Message-ID: 24062.901034597@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)trust(dot)ee> writes:
> We should develop (or at least prominently promote _and_ document) some
> kind of file/package format or tool (maybe like illustra datablades),
> that would standardize the layout of contrib types.
> Also, the need to manually get oids is a real show-stopper.

Yes. I've been thinking off and on about some homegrown data types
(not general-purpose enough to be worthwhile even as contrib material).
But the admin overhead seems like a real pain. If we want to promote
Postgres' type system as a major benefit, we ought to work harder at
making it easy to add locally-defined types.

regards, tom lane

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hannu Krosing 1998-07-21 15:31:00 Re: Complexity of contrib types
Previous Message Tom Lane 1998-07-21 15:18:59 Re: [HACKERS] cidr