From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Jason Tishler <Jason(dot)Tishler(at)dothill(dot)com> |
Cc: | Pgsql-Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Pgsql-Cygwin <pgsql-cygwin(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Michael Lemke <lemkemch(at)t-online(dot)de>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Subject: | Re: [PATCHES] Cygwin PostgreSQL ESQL Patch |
Date: | 2001-05-03 13:45:16 |
Message-ID: | 24046.988897516@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-cygwin pgsql-patches |
Jason Tishler <Jason(dot)Tishler(at)dothill(dot)com> writes:
> The current version of my patch is just doing what you suggested. Are you
> no longer recommending this approach as the best compromise?
I don't have a better idea ... but I thought I'd mention the point
again, just in case someone else can think of one.
>> The Makefile changes look OK to me but Peter E. would be more qualified
>> to comment on them.
> Let's see what Peter has to say about the Makefile parts.
Peter, if those changes look OK would you commit the patch? Or if
you're short of time today, let me know and I'll do it. Need to get
7.1.1 wrapped up ...
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2001-05-03 14:38:30 | Re: [PATCHES] Cygwin PostgreSQL ESQL Patch |
Previous Message | Jason Tishler | 2001-05-03 13:37:09 | Re: [PATCHES] Cygwin PostgreSQL ESQL Patch |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2001-05-03 14:38:30 | Re: [PATCHES] Cygwin PostgreSQL ESQL Patch |
Previous Message | Jason Tishler | 2001-05-03 13:37:09 | Re: [PATCHES] Cygwin PostgreSQL ESQL Patch |