Re: snapshot generation broken

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: snapshot generation broken
Date: 2010-09-24 19:47:33
Message-ID: 23959.1285357653@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
> On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 07:15, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
>> And NLS is also fixed.

> Great. Thanks - that takes one more thing off the cvs requirement ;)

Yeah. Maybe we don't need a cvsserver after all. Would it make more
sense to help Stefan get git running on his BSD boxes? If Bruce and
I could get it to work on our pet dinosaurs, I think it likely can
be gotten to work on spoonbill too.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2010-09-24 19:54:40 Re: snapshot generation broken
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-09-24 19:41:47 Re: What happened to the is_<type> family of functions proposal?