| From: | "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: commitfest 2018-07 |
| Date: | 2018-06-07 03:08:03 |
| Message-ID: | 2394C4F3-6FF1-4748-BEC5-F8E7F0C29E25@postgresql.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> On Jun 6, 2018, at 8:14 PM, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 06, 2018 at 12:40:40PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>> I'll volunteer for CFM, which seems appropriate since I was one of the
>> supporters of having an extra CF.
>
> I don't mind helping out either. There are many patches to handle.
+1 to either both of you working together or one of you taking the charge.
Doing a scan, there are currently 152 patches in there and presumably
more on the way. Scanning through the most recent CFs it appears # patches
ranged from 150-250, and conceivably the lower end of that # is still a lot to
manage for one person.
Jonathan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Rowley | 2018-06-07 03:21:18 | Re: why partition pruning doesn't work? |
| Previous Message | Amit Langote | 2018-06-07 02:51:09 | Re: why partition pruning doesn't work? |