Re: WIN1252 encoding - backend or not?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: WIN1252 encoding - backend or not?
Date: 2004-12-04 18:46:36
Message-ID: 23928.1102185996@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> As far as the patch itself, I don't think I ever claimed it was ready
> for prime time --- rather, I followed process and it was applied.

Applying it on the day before we go RC is claiming that it is ready for
prime time. As Jan already told you, the "process" may include applying
patches by default during devel cycle, but it can't work that way in
late beta.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2004-12-04 19:04:54 Re: WIN1252 encoding - backend or not?
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2004-12-04 18:26:45 Re: WIN1252 encoding - backend or not?