| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Rushabh Lathia <rushabh(dot)lathia(at)gmail(dot)com>, Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Confusing docs about GetForeignUpperPaths in fdwhandler.sgml |
| Date: | 2016-10-26 19:18:21 |
| Message-ID: | 23899.1477509501@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I'm not interested in committing this patch. I don't believe it is an
> improvement on what we've got today.
> Tom, any chance you could offer an opinion?
I have no objection to this patch as such, but I think that the docs
around FDW direct modify need significantly more work than this.
I've had a to-do item for awhile to work on that, but it hasn't gotten
to the top of the list.
A larger issue is that I think the API itself is poorly designed, as
I stated awhile ago (<31706(dot)1457547166(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>) and was told it
was too late to object. So that's kind of discouraged me from bothering.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2016-10-26 19:24:53 | Re: pg_hba_file_settings view patch |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2016-10-26 19:12:11 | Re: emergency outage requiring database restart |