Re: JDBC int8 hack

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Kyle VanderBeek <kylev(at)yaga(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: JDBC int8 hack
Date: 2001-05-07 23:37:16
Message-ID: 23852.989278636@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Can someone comment on this? It appends :int8 to long constants in Java
> to fix our problem with not using int8 indexes with uncase long values.
> Is this fixed in 7.1, and therefore the patch isn't needed?

The problem is still there, but I think this proposed fix is entirely
inappropriate. See prior thread.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hiroshi Inoue 2001-05-07 23:40:34 Re: ODBC cleanup
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2001-05-07 22:11:09 Re: patch for BETWEEN [ASYMMETRIC|SYMMETRIC]