| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Vladimir Sitnikov <sitnikov(dot)vladimir(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Marko Tiikkaja <marko(at)joh(dot)to>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Albe Laurenz <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Fwd: [JDBC] Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102 |
| Date: | 2016-01-18 21:44:17 |
| Message-ID: | 23852.1453153457@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> This isn't the first complaint about this mechanism that we've gotten,
> and it won't be the last. Way too many of our users are way more
> aware than they should be that the threshold here is five rather than
> any other number, which to me is a clear-cut sign that this needs to
> be improved.
No argument there.
> How to improve it is a harder question.
Exactly. I'm very suspicious of any easy answers to this; they'll
most likely just shift the pain around.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2016-01-18 21:47:01 | Re: exposing pg_controldata and pg_config as functions |
| Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2016-01-18 21:42:42 | Re: [PATCH] Improve spinlock inline assembly for x86. |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thomas Kellerer | 2016-01-18 22:50:08 | Re: [JDBC] 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102 |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2016-01-18 21:33:52 | Re: Fwd: [JDBC] Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102 |