Re: BUG #19363: PostgreSQL shared memory exhaustion during query execution involving views and parallel workers

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Richard Guo <guofenglinux(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: jinhui(dot)lai(at)qq(dot)com, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #19363: PostgreSQL shared memory exhaustion during query execution involving views and parallel workers
Date: 2025-12-27 21:33:19
Message-ID: 2380298.1766871199@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

I wrote:
> What I'm wondering is why this plan was accepted at all. Does PHJ
> not consider work_mem or a similar limit on hash table size?

Ah, found it. See

https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/2380165.1766871097%40sss.pgh.pa.us

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Previous Message Tom Lane 2025-12-27 17:02:17 Re: BUG #19363: PostgreSQL shared memory exhaustion during query execution involving views and parallel workers