| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Expand palloc/pg_malloc API |
| Date: | 2022-09-09 20:13:10 |
| Message-ID: | 237715.1662754390@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> I have updated this patch set to rename the _obj() functions to
> _object(), and I have dropped the _ptrtype() variants.
> I have also split the patch to put the new API and the example uses into
> separate patches.
This patch set seems fine to me, so I've marked it Ready for Committer.
I think serious consideration should be given to back-patching the
0001 part (that is, addition of the macros). Otherwise we'll have
to remember not to use these macros in code intended for back-patch,
and that'll be mighty annoying once we are used to them.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2022-09-09 20:25:29 | Re: Expand palloc/pg_malloc API |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2022-09-09 19:36:38 | Re: [BUG] Storage declaration in ECPG |